Collaborative divorce versus mediation
As people approach the end of their marriage, they often consider how best to dissolve the union in the least stressful and contentious way possible. Both collaborative divorce and divorce mediation on becoming increasingly popular options in the state of Utah, as they are considered just as effective as litigation in many cases. And while both processes promote communication and conflict resolution between divorcing parties, there are several key points that distinguish collaborative divorce techniques from mediation.
Discussing the primary differences between collaborative divorce and divorce mediation, the First Wives World explains that the former process can be considerably more expensive than the latter. While one source estimates that collaborative divorce can cost close to $20,000, mediation can cost less than $7,000. It is also noted that some criticisms has been raised over the ethicality of collaborative divorce practices, since attorneys who participate in the process work on behalf of both divorcing parties.
According to NBC News, collaborative divorce does offer a number of benefits that many people prefer over divorce mediation. For instance, collaborative divorce often involves the participation of multiple experts, in addition to each party’s attorney, to reach a settlement that is fair and reasonable. Mediation, on the other hand, relies on the opinion of one mediator. Beyond that, many people are reassured by the level of confidentiality provided by collaborative divorce guidelines. And while collaborative divorce is not a suitable option in some cases, it is becoming more widely accepted for being fair and effective in resolving many kinds of common divorce disputes.